| 1 |
Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 2 |
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:58:09 +1200, Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Since it has been nearly completely implemented. Just need to |
| 6 |
>>> improve how users interact with it. [1] It is entirely my fault |
| 7 |
>>> that this is not already in use as I should have pushed this. I |
| 8 |
>>> will attempt to do the require eclass change and revbump the latest |
| 9 |
>>> java-config with a patch this week. |
| 10 |
>> What is the status here? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> java-config and documentation are done. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Great, thanks! Does that include eselect java-vm though? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Next is too start bumping ebuilds and create a news item. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Do we want to be doing the 1.4 vm's. Really think we should start pushing |
| 19 |
> them out of the tree by patching ( or removing ) the packages that depend on |
| 20 |
> them. I did 2 today, openjms and something ( openjms wasn't even a patch but |
| 21 |
> rather a property passed to ant ). |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Alistair. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I agree that we should get rid of 1.4 completely. Then we can see about |
| 26 |
1.5. Last rited 3 packages so far, removed old versions of others, will |
| 27 |
try to continue. With Betelgeuse we agreed that java5 USE flag should go |
| 28 |
away as well, so I'll be removing it, and defaulting to 1.5. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Vlastimil |
Archives