Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work.
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:31:01
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work. by Fabian Groffen
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 26-01-2009 17:49:45 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: >> Please find attached the output of repoman over java-experimental. I >> was only able to achieve this after a few modifications to portage trunk >> ( There are a few things to be aware of. >> >> 1) I haven't got a clue whether it actually works. I would actually >> like ppl to confirm that it does/discover where it doesn't >> 2) Im interested to know what doesn't work, but im not actually >> expecting those patches to be the final implementation. This is >> something that _just seems to work_. Therefore don't be surprised if >> nothing more comes of this. Hopefully these patches work in all >> situations but they may not requiring a far more invasive >> implementation. I have no experience with the portage codebase so I >> doubt I could do that implementation. >> >> The patch will be posted to gentoo-dev. > > before you do, it might make sense to remove the hardcoded reference to > your overlay on your disk ;)
#Im hardcoding this as I haven't a clue how to figure out #path of overlay based on repo_name without doing it manually and im am lazy. #currently only supports 1 level of master, should be updated to handle arbitary number #of parents and parent parents. :P
> > zmedico is usually quite open for patches, but I guess you need to make > it a little bit more generic than it is now. > > My 0.02 > > >