| 1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
>> I propose to deprecate ejavac and remove it in gen3 - writting build.xml files |
| 3 |
>> is very easy, so I don't see any reason why not to do so for few packages still |
| 4 |
>> using ejavac: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well is there any compelling reason not to support it? Works fine and |
| 7 |
> does what it is supposed to. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
IMVHO it's a hack to not write a build.xml, you have to run ejavac, then jar, |
| 10 |
eventually javadoc - why? Isn't it easier (and less error prone) to do it in |
| 11 |
build.xml? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
BTW. you don't have to CC me when replying - I'm reading gentoo-java :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xBC555551 |
| 17 |
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java, apache, ppc... |
Archives