Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Jan Riedel <ml.gentoo@××××××××.de>
To: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt@××××××××××××××××.com>
Cc: Gentoo Java <gentoo-java@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Gentoo Java / Apache Tomcat choices vs FreeBSD
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:02:29
Message-Id: 43F8B278.1070900@o2online.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Gentoo Java / Apache Tomcat choices vs FreeBSD by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:57 +0100, Jan Riedel wrote:
3 >> i think it's not necessary to make an own ebuild for mod_proxy_ajp. the
4 >> best way would be an new use-flag for apache-2.2.0 to enable the option
5 >> "--enable-proxy-ajp" during configure and the module mod_proxy_ajp.so
6 >> would be built.
7 >
8 > So is it bundled then with Apache? Would seem so if one could
9 > build/compile it as part of the Apache build/compile processes.
10 >
11 yes it's bundled with apache-2.2.0
12
13 > If that is the case, then the ability to build or not would fall on the
14 > team/herd responsible for Apache.
15 >
16
17 i only wanted to refer to the start of this thread from michael vince...:
18 <quote>
19 My main problems are there is not a full set of choices of Apache that
20 being just 1.3.x or Apache 2.0.x and no Apache 2.2.x.
21 Apache 2.2.x has some great new features like a built in AJP module for
22 linking Tomcat and Apache together with out needing the external mod_ajp
23 module.
24 </quote>
25
26 ...and tell him that apache2.2.0 is now in portage and that the module
27 mod_proxy_ajp is not beeing built by default and there is a problem with
28 apr and the useflag "ipv6".
29 i didn't want the gentoo java team to care about this.
30 sorry for the misunderstanding.
31
32 btw., is there any newsgroup for gentoo and apache related
33 information/problems?
34
35 regards,
36 jan
37 --
38 gentoo-java@g.o mailing list