| 1 |
Martin von Gagern wrote: |
| 2 |
> I added a list of little steps at the end of the guide. I don't know how |
| 3 |
> the assignment of devs to tasks usually works, but it would be great if |
| 4 |
> we could fill the list with assigned persons and estimated times. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Greetings, |
| 7 |
> Martin von Gagern |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The list of steps definitely looks good, and gives us a good plan of |
| 11 |
attack. Overall, the migration plan looks really good, although I'm |
| 12 |
still trying to get a few for a few bits of it, particularly when/how |
| 13 |
we'd migrate to the 'next gen' style of ebuilds. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Before going forward with the plan, though, it would probably be a good |
| 16 |
idea for all the java devs to, you know, agree to go through with this |
| 17 |
plan :) This is particularly important because we would be the ones |
| 18 |
actually committing these to portage. I'd say we're at the point where |
| 19 |
we could/should have a meeting in #gentoo-java to go over this. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
As far as taking up particular tasks and whatnot, I'm not particular |
| 22 |
sure myself, being the new guy and all. But given that all work is |
| 23 |
voluntary anyways, I'd imagine people would volunteer for taking care of |
| 24 |
this or that task. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- Josh (nichoj) |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives