Re: [gentoo-java] [RFC] Deprecation of ejavac

[William L. Thomson Jr.]

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 21:47 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> I don't agree it's hack. I think it's easier to write few lines in
> ebuild than writing build.xml which needs ant dependency, takes space in
> FILESDIR and in the end does exactly the same thing.

I agree as well and just converted bcprov and bcmail to both use ejavac
and not use a build.xml. One, I believe bcprov, used to use a build.xml,
but for recent changes or etc I would have had to modify and then had
two versions to maintain and deal with. It's just another file to
maintain and I prefer to have as little files in filesdir as possible.
Ideally none other than digest :)

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/Java