1 |
Actually i have an ebuild for geronimo, but it's a binary-based one. |
2 |
Should i contribute so that there's something until someone write a |
3 |
source one ? |
4 |
|
5 |
Alistair Bush wrote: |
6 |
> Jose That does sound interesting. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> At present all J2EE activity is towards trying to package JBoss on Gentoo |
9 |
> (sanely). Geronimo is on the list of J2EE implementations that we (fordforg |
10 |
> and myself) are planing on looking at. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If you would like to attempt to package Geronimo we would be happy go give you |
13 |
> advice, either thru the mailing list or on irc://freenode/#gentoo-java |
14 |
> |
15 |
> (The above is a blantant attempt to get more worker ants for the J2EE effort). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I personally was considering attempting to package the glassfish project after |
18 |
> jboss but I may now consider Geronimo (or do them jointly) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Alistair |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 5:13 am, José González Gómez wrote: |
25 |
> |
26 |
>> Some time ago I found about the Apache Directory Server [1]. Just one month |
27 |
>> ago they released the 1.0 version, and it seems very interesting: you may |
28 |
>> have a directory server providing integrated NTP, DHCP, DNS, Kerberos and |
29 |
>> of course LDAP services. Has anybody any experience with this? Am I the |
30 |
>> only one interested in an ebuild for this? |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> The Apache Directory Server seems to be integrated in the Geronimo JEE |
33 |
>> server [2]. I found that there seems to be no work being done at |
34 |
>> bugs.g.o[3] |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> [1] http://directory.apache.org/ |
37 |
>> [2] http://geronimo.apache.org/ |
38 |
>> [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115506 |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> Best regards |
41 |
>> Jose |
42 |
>> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |