1 |
> On 20-02-2011 03:52, Alistair Bush wrote: |
2 |
> >> Ken (mostly) and I gave a shot at bug 146593 bumping XOM in tree. After |
3 |
> >> a few iterations we have hit the issue that has been discovered in the |
4 |
> >> past, circular dependency on Jaxen. I'm asking if splitting xom to |
5 |
> >> xom-core and xom-jaxen is OK, as don in jdom. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Yes. Please also file a bug with upstream. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Upstream does more weird stuff checking out jaxen sources from scm |
10 |
> during xom build. |
11 |
|
12 |
Load your shotgun then. :) |