> On 20-02-2011 03:52, Alistair Bush wrote:
> >> Ken (mostly) and I gave a shot at bug 146593 bumping XOM in tree. After
> >> a few iterations we have hit the issue that has been discovered in the
> >> past, circular dependency on Jaxen. I'm asking if splitting xom to
> >> xom-core and xom-jaxen is OK, as don in jdom.
> > Yes. Please also file a bug with upstream.
> Upstream does more weird stuff checking out jaxen sources from scm
> during xom build.