| 1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> After testing the new java setup I have found that packages using jni |
| 3 |
> have problems. The problem is with locating jni.h. There is no standard |
| 4 |
> way to find these so this is what two packages I have so far looked at use. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> 1.sys-libs/db |
| 7 |
> db looks at path for the location of javac and tries to make the |
| 8 |
> location from that. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> 2.dev-java/jdictrayapi |
| 11 |
> jdictrayapi expects to find JAVA_HOME in the environment |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So we should decide a solution to this problem. One bad but working |
| 14 |
> solution to get stuff working quickly is to play with C(XX)FLAGS. We |
| 15 |
> could also make symlinks to /usr/include or we can just patch all the |
| 16 |
> packages using jni so that they work how we want them to. java-config -0 |
| 17 |
> can be used to set the include locations inside the Makefiles. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It would of course be best if whatever solution we come up with doesn't |
| 21 |
require a lot of patching. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Radical idea: Can we provide one "standard" jni.h, and put it into, say, |
| 24 |
javatoolkit? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- Karl T |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives