Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: "Peter B. West" <lists@××××××.au>
Cc: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: the new java setup and jni
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:41:36
Message-Id: 430716D6.2010404@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Peter B. West wrote:
5 >
6 > Don't worry about it. Debate is not a dirty word, as far as I'm concerned.
7 >
8 > However, I am concerned that support for J5 is held up by what, to me,
9 > are completely peripheral concerns. I've read the Stallman "philosophy"
10 > about the Java Trap, and I put it on a par with his contributions to the
11 > Bitkeeper debate. I'm using Java 5 *now*, and I'm a new convert to
12 > Gentoo. I looks as though I'm better off abandoning ebuilds for Java
13 > apps and development tools, and going back to the manual maintenance I
14 > was using under FC3.
15
16 Well the java herd always needs more people improving the ebuilds. There
17 are 151 ebuilds in the dev-java category and only a few active devs. So
18 please instead of going the manual way, file bugs at bugs.gentoo.org.
19
20 >
21 > In case you're wondering, I use J5 for open source development.
22 >
23
24 I don't think there are any problems using J5 for development at the
25 moment. Just don't use it as the system vm. Of course installing masked
26 packages can make users a little unconfortable.
27
28 >
29 > Peter
30 >
31
32 Petteri
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
35 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
36
37 iD8DBQFDBxbVcxLzpIGCsLQRAgHaAJ9Y2hdYvc9DuzxNYBgTwUN6FYJVogCfY2oY
38 AiBUrxW5dZPnnQvEQ85CZHQ=
39 =ViJo
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 --
42 gentoo-java@g.o mailing list