| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:37 -0500, Joshua Nichols wrote: |
| 2 |
> Over this past weekend, I put migration-overlay into the main tree: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Everything related to it is currently sitting in package.mask: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Thanks for doing this, and for the E-mail update. I've been noticing |
| 7 |
the changes in migration-overlay this weekend. :-) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
FYI: For some reason (at least in my mail client) some extra chars |
| 10 |
(like this: "> ") appear at the beginning of a few lines in your list |
| 11 |
(below). Folks should be aware that certain packages won't be visible |
| 12 |
unless they remove these extra characters from the front of the |
| 13 |
applicable lines. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The corrected list should appear something like this: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
#---------------------------------------- |
| 18 |
# Joshua Nichols<nichoj@g.o> (24 Jun 2006) |
| 19 |
# Masked for testing changes to Java |
| 20 |
>=dev-java/java-config-1.3 |
| 21 |
dev-java/java-config-wrapper |
| 22 |
>dev-java/javatoolkit-0.1.0 |
| 23 |
>=dev-java/ant-core-1.6.5-r13 |
| 24 |
>=dev-java/ant-tasks-1.6.5-r2 |
| 25 |
>=dev-java/jikes-1.22-r12 |
| 26 |
>=dev-java/eclipse-ecj-3.1-r13 |
| 27 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.3.1-r23 |
| 28 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1-r12 |
| 29 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03-r12 |
| 30 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.3.1-r20 |
| 31 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.1-r12 |
| 32 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.03-r11 |
| 33 |
=dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.4.2.04-r10 |
| 34 |
=dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.5.0-r11 |
| 35 |
=dev-java/ibm-jre-bin-1.4.2.05 |
| 36 |
=dev-java/jrockit-jdk-bin-1.4.2.10 |
| 37 |
=dev-java/jrockit-jdk-bin-1.5.0.06 |
| 38 |
=dev-java/kaffe-1.1.7 |
| 39 |
=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.12 |
| 40 |
=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.07 |
| 41 |
=dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.12 |
| 42 |
=dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.07 |
| 43 |
#--------------------------------------- |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Another note: You list sun-jdk-1.5.0.07 and my system does have it |
| 46 |
installed (it appeared in migration-overlay a week or two ago). |
| 47 |
However, the ebuild appears to have been deleted from the overlay and it |
| 48 |
is NOT anywhere in the main Portage tree. Unless you still need to add |
| 49 |
it something must have gone wrong. Just FYI... |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
> I would like to unmask these packages in the next few days. At that |
| 53 |
> point, I'd like to 'officially' announce it, as in put it on the front |
| 54 |
> page, send to -announce, etc. |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Sounds good to me. They seem to be working well so my vote is "the |
| 57 |
sooner the better". |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
Thanks again for all of the hard work! |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
~ Greg T. |
Archives