1 |
I just tried to do so, but i can't seem to be able to logon to bugzilla, |
2 |
even resetted the password, but it won't allow logon *sigh*... Could |
3 |
someone please take the files directly from my overlay at |
4 |
https://svn.jguild.com/gentoo-overlay/www-servers/geronimo/ and put them |
5 |
on bugzilla |
6 |
|
7 |
Miroslav S wrote: |
8 |
> You can attach it here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115506 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> -- |
11 |
> Miroslav |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Yannick Menager wrote: |
14 |
> |
15 |
>> Actually i have an ebuild for geronimo, but it's a binary-based one. |
16 |
>> Should i contribute so that there's something until someone write a |
17 |
>> source one ? |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> Alistair Bush wrote: |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>>> Jose That does sound interesting. |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>>> At present all J2EE activity is towards trying to package JBoss on |
24 |
>>> Gentoo (sanely). Geronimo is on the list of J2EE implementations |
25 |
>>> that we (fordforg and myself) are planing on looking at. |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> If you would like to attempt to package Geronimo we would be happy go |
28 |
>>> give you advice, either thru the mailing list or on |
29 |
>>> irc://freenode/#gentoo-java |
30 |
>>> |
31 |
>>> (The above is a blantant attempt to get more worker ants for the J2EE |
32 |
>>> effort). |
33 |
>>> |
34 |
>>> I personally was considering attempting to package the glassfish |
35 |
>>> project after jboss but I may now consider Geronimo (or do them jointly) |
36 |
>>> |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>> Alistair |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |