Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Mike Weissman <mike@××××××.com>
To: "'Petteri Räty'" <betelgeuse@g.o>, 'Gentoo Java' <gentoo-java@l.g.o>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-java] Do we need ant-1.7.0?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:53:49
Message-Id: !&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAILikSqoOghAgEutkcQSsrnCgAAAEAAAACYrZlKXkedDu7dZStVA5aMBAAAAAA==@weisso.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-java] Do we need ant-1.7.0? by "Petteri Räty"
1 Probably could just remove it, but some of the Jboss Tools I use have issues with ant-1.7.1, the one that comes to mind is Seam, but that is not even in portage yet.
2
3 Thanks,
4 weisso
5
6 -----Original Message-----
7 From: Petteri Räty [mailto:betelgeuse@g.o]
8 Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:43 AM
9 To: Gentoo Java
10 Subject: [gentoo-java] Do we need ant-1.7.0?
11
12 ant-1.7.0 has built_with_use calls so it should either be migrated
13 to EAPI 2 or just removed. As 1.7.1 is mainly a bugfix release this
14 shouldn't be a problem but please shout if you absolutely still need
15 1.7.0 for something.
16
17 Regards,
18 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
smime.p7s application/x-pkcs7-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Do we need ant-1.7.0? Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o>