Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kbase

From: Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
To: gentoo-kbase@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kbase] Next step
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:18:50
Message-Id: 44872697.4050805@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-kbase] Next step by Sven Vermeulen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Sven Vermeulen wrote:
5 > Which reminds me, I've updated the glep draft to mention that its content is
6 > public domain. It seems to me that anything that warrants a different
7 > license shouldn't be in the kbase as a topic but rather as a guide (or book)
8 > by the Gentoo Documentation Project.
9
10 Seems good. Though are there really any docs in the GDP (besides the articles)
11 that aren't cc-by-sa, or at least dual license along with cc-by-sa?
12
13 What, by the way, should the kbase license be? Same as we've been using for
14 /doc/en/?
15 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
16 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
17
18 iD8DBQFEhyaWrsJQqN81j74RAn4RAJ9zMwT2Y488hBYman3wSNsiJKJMtQCgr0IE
19 JP7BglvWbqf1QTT/gGmW0I0=
20 =FUn2
21 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 --
23 gentoo-kbase@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-kbase] Next step Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>