1 |
В Вск, 24/07/2011 в 17:20 +0200, Ulrich Mueller пишет: |
2 |
> >>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Stratos Psomadakis wrote: |
3 |
> > On 07/23/2011 07:09 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: |
4 |
> >> Currently virtual/linux-sources-2.6 depends on sys-kernel/foo-2.6*, |
5 |
> >> should we create virtual/linux-sources-3.0 (and start fixing |
6 |
> >> ebuilds depending on =virtual/linux-sources-2.6) or just change |
7 |
> >> virtual/linux-sources-2.6 to depend on >=2.6 ? Opinions? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Currently version 3.0 is only available with vanilla-sources and |
10 |
> gentoo-sources. Therefore the problem is that virtual/linux-sources-3 |
11 |
> would pull in one of these even for users of other *-sources (e.g. |
12 |
> hardened). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> On the other hand, allowing versions 3.* as dependency of |
15 |
> virtual/linux-sources-2.6 might be confusing. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Therefore, my suggestion would be as follows: |
18 |
> 1. Temporarily change the dependency in virtual/linux-sources-2.6 |
19 |
> to >=2.6 in order to resolve the current issues with dependencies. |
20 |
> 2. Later, when most of *-sources are available in version 3.*, revert |
21 |
> linux-sources-2.6 to the current dependency and create |
22 |
> virtual/linux-sources-3. (I think the version should be just 3 and |
23 |
> not 3.0, unless you want a virtual for 3.0, 3.1, etc.) |
24 |
|
25 |
What are the benefits here? |
26 |
|
27 |
> Or, a completely different approach: Drop the versioning of the |
28 |
> virtual altogether and have only virtual/linux-sources-0. (This might |
29 |
> cause some minor problems for users of 2.4 profiles, but I'd guess |
30 |
> that the remaining users are experienced enough to handle that.) |
31 |
|
32 |
And what are the benefits here? |
33 |
|
34 |
It's better to fix what's broken part and avoid fixing something that |
35 |
works... |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Peter. |