1 |
On 06/24/2013 12:27 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 08:45:25AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
3 |
>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:42:44 -0700 |
4 |
>> Greg KH <greg@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 02:45:16AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
7 |
>>>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:13:03 -0700 |
8 |
>>>> Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>>> Great! But as only the latest version released is "stable", |
11 |
>>>>> that's all that should stick around, right? |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> Tricky decision to make. Do we really want to force people's kernel |
14 |
>>>> sources to unmerge every single time you push a new version? Which |
15 |
>>>> on its own turn, forces them to build and install the new kernel. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> If they are following the vanilla kernels, isn't that what people |
18 |
>>> expect? The latest stable-kernel-of-the-week, as that's what I'm |
19 |
>>> releasing. They don't have to do an update if they don't want to :) |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> If we don't keep around other ebuilds their sources will unexpectedly |
22 |
>> unmerge upon a dependency clean; they can only stop it if they see it |
23 |
>> in the list of packages that will be unmerged, and do something to |
24 |
>> specifically keep them. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> True, so we can keep around 3-4 older ebuilds if needed, per kernel |
27 |
> release. But who really does a dependency clean these days, I've never |
28 |
> done one :) |
29 |
> |
30 |
> So, what's the next step? Should I announce the change to -dev? Anyone |
31 |
> else really object to it? Other thoughts? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> thanks, |
34 |
> |
35 |
> greg k-h |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
Greg, |
39 |
|
40 |
This sounds okay to me, but let's see what the lead says. You're best |
41 |
suited to decide which versions to keep or toss, so as far as I'm |
42 |
concerned, just do what you've been doing as I see from the ChangeLog. |
43 |
|
44 |
There is, however, some disagreement about whether we should still |
45 |
continue stabilizing vanilla-sources, but we can debate that on -dev. |
46 |
|
47 |
--Tony |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. |
51 |
Chair of Information Technology |
52 |
D'Youville College |
53 |
Buffalo, NY 14201 |
54 |
(716) 829-8197 |