Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kernel

From: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
To: gentoo-kernel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] 3.12 Kernels : Regression in the handling of usbatm debug traces
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 07:14:26
Message-Id: 20140309071501.GB22454@kroah.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-kernel] 3.12 Kernels : Regression in the handling of usbatm debug traces by "Eric F. GARIOUD"
1 On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:38:52AM +0100, Eric F. GARIOUD wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 04 March 2014 19:16:35 Greg KH wrote:
3 > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:39:11AM +0100, Eric F. GARIOUD wrote:
4 > > > Having CONFIG_USB_ATM set and CONFIG_USB_DEBUG not set, syslogs are now
5 > > > overfed with kyriads of
6 > > >
7 > > > << usbatm_rx_process: xyzt callbacks suppressed >>
8 > > >
9 > > > messages per minute.
10 > > >
11 > > > - My understanding is that a commit from Greg K-H caused the trouble :
12 > > >
13 > > > quoted from https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/2/429 :
14 > > >
15 > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman (46):...
16 > > >
17 > > > USB: usbatm: don't rely on CONFIG_USB_DEBUG USB: usbatm: remove
18 > > >
19 > > > CONFIG_USB_DEBUG dependancy
20 > > >
21 > > > - My understanding is that Krzysztof Mazur reported that behaviour as part
22 > > > of
23 > > >
24 > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/26/65
25 > > >
26 > > > Greg K-H is involved in the discussion and a patch seems to have been
27 > > > produced. I did not manage to find it commited in 3.12
28 > > >
29 > > > - Are there good reasons for this patch not to be commited ?
30 > >
31 > > What specific patch are you referring to?
32 >
33 > http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1310.3/01055.html
34 > That is : [PATCH V2] printk: pr_debug_ratelimited: check state first toreduce
35 > "callbacks suppressed" messages.
36 >
37 > And
38 >
39 > http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1310.3/01056.html
40 > That is : [PATCH V2] usbatm: Fix dynamic_debug / ratelimited atm_dbg
41 > andatm_rldbg macros
42 >
43 > > > - If not, as I understand 3.12 is longterm and maintained by Jiri Slaby,
44 > > > could someone forward him a request to commit Joe Perches' work ?
45 > >
46 > > Why can't you?
47 >
48 > Heu... I am nothing but an humble end-user you know. When, in some thread I
49 > read Greg K-H writing that he will commit the patch and AFAIK does not, then I
50 > presume there is something wrong in my own understanding.
51 > If, in addition to this, neither the reporter of the bug nor the author of the
52 > patch push for committing then, at the very least, I do not feel personally
53 > entitled to bother the longterm maintainer with this.
54
55 This is all fixed in 3.13, so don't even worry about 3.12 anymore, you
56 should have been upgraded already.
57
58 greg k-h

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-kernel] 3.12 Kernels : Regression in the handling of usbatm debug traces "Eric F. GARIOUD" <eric-f.garioud@×××××××.fr>