Archives
Archives
| From: | Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-kernel@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme | ||
| Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:55:45 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20060213225524.GA23419@kroah.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme by Daniel Drake |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:41:14PM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 2 | > FIXES |
| 3 | > ===== |
| 4 | > 1000-1400 linux-stable |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Why does this need to be so big? Why not just include the -stable |
| 7 | patches directly, all rolled up (2.6.15.4), instead of all broken out? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Other than that, I have no problem with the new scheme. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | thanks, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | greg k-h |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme | Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> |