[gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions

[Greg KH]

Hi all,

I bumped the vanilla-kernel sources yesterday, and deleted some
obsolete, and known-insecure versions at the same time (i.e. the 3.7 and
3.8 ebuilds.)  They were added back because they were the last releases
marked "stable" for some arches.

In thinking about this, that's totally wrong.  Either all of these
ebuilds are marked stable, or none are.  And we should really NEVER have
known buggy ebuilds marked stable for the vanilla kernels, as that's
just dangerous on many different levels.

So, should I just mark these always stable, or never stable?  I don't
think we should mix the two, as the previous versions are always known
buggy, and have problems, and shouldn't be used.

thanks,

greg k-h