Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kernel

From: Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o>
To: gentoo-kernel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:57:06
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme by Greg KH
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:41:14PM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote: >> FIXES >> ===== >> 1000-1400 linux-stable > > Why does this need to be so big? Why not just include the -stable > patches directly, all rolled up (, instead of all broken out?
Sometimes (admittedly not very often) we get clashes. For example, the usermode-sources upstream patch sometimes includes UML fixes which are also present in -stable. This allows us to work around that with minimal hassle in the ebuild, by setting UNIPATCH_EXCLUDE=1234 where 1234 is the genpatches ID of the duplicated patch. Daniel -- gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>