Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kernel

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-kernel@l.g.o
Cc: jlec@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] Notice of addition of "4567_distro-Gentoo-Kconfig.patch" ("Add Gentoo Linux support config settings and defaults.") to genpatches.
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:55:02
Message-Id: 20130815205456.6620e6ea@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-kernel] Notice of addition of "4567_distro-Gentoo-Kconfig.patch" ("Add Gentoo Linux support config settings and defaults.") to genpatches. by Justin
1 On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:00:19 +0200
2 Justin <jlec@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 15/08/13 19:28, Tom Wijsman wrote:
5 > > Hello
6 > >
7 > >
8 > >
9 > > If you maintain kernels based on genpatches for a non Gentoo Linux
10 > > audience and do not want a Gentoo Linux menu or Gentoo Linux
11 > > defaults present on those particular kernels; then I want to make
12 > > you aware that you need to ensure that you drop
13 > > 4567_distro-Gentoo-Kconfig.patch from the patch set after
14 > > extraction.
15 > >
16 >
17 > How about adding this patch to an extra tarball so that we can simply
18 > switch it of be not setting it in K_WANT_GENPATCHES?
19
20 This complicates the eclass, genpatches scripts and all in tree ebuilds
21 for a single patch in a single tarball; why not just exclude it if you
22 explicitly don't want it? It's not much more than your proposal; so,
23 excluding the patch seems like a much more simpler approach.
24
25 Alternatively, people can add a patch that patches away ./Kconfig:11.
26
27 This is also meant to be opt-out and not opt-in; as in the end, this
28 change causes documentation changes and thus must be present in any
29 kernel on Gentoo Linux, otherwise we are introducing inconsistency.
30
31 --
32 With kind regards,
33
34 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
35 Gentoo Developer
36
37 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
38 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
39 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature