1 |
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:00:19 +0200 |
2 |
Justin <jlec@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 15/08/13 19:28, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
5 |
> > Hello |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > If you maintain kernels based on genpatches for a non Gentoo Linux |
10 |
> > audience and do not want a Gentoo Linux menu or Gentoo Linux |
11 |
> > defaults present on those particular kernels; then I want to make |
12 |
> > you aware that you need to ensure that you drop |
13 |
> > 4567_distro-Gentoo-Kconfig.patch from the patch set after |
14 |
> > extraction. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> |
17 |
> How about adding this patch to an extra tarball so that we can simply |
18 |
> switch it of be not setting it in K_WANT_GENPATCHES? |
19 |
|
20 |
This complicates the eclass, genpatches scripts and all in tree ebuilds |
21 |
for a single patch in a single tarball; why not just exclude it if you |
22 |
explicitly don't want it? It's not much more than your proposal; so, |
23 |
excluding the patch seems like a much more simpler approach. |
24 |
|
25 |
Alternatively, people can add a patch that patches away ./Kconfig:11. |
26 |
|
27 |
This is also meant to be opt-out and not opt-in; as in the end, this |
28 |
change causes documentation changes and thus must be present in any |
29 |
kernel on Gentoo Linux, otherwise we are introducing inconsistency. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
With kind regards, |
33 |
|
34 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
35 |
Gentoo Developer |
36 |
|
37 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
38 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
39 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |