Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kernel

From: "Eric F. GARIOUD" <eric-f.garioud@×××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-kernel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:20:02
Message-Id: 201304131519.58650.eric-f.garioud@wanadoo.fr
In Reply to: [gentoo-kernel] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing? by Tom Wijsman
1 On Friday 12 April 2013 23:41:05 Tom Wijsman wrote:
2
3 > Attached you will find the various changes I plan to apply to
4 > kernel-2.eclass
5
6 Thank you for these.
7
8 > That being said, since 3.8.7 has landed upstream we would like to hear
9 > about any issues we don't know about yet that would block stabilization;
10 > if we can, I plan to start stabilization in less than two weeks. Unless
11 > there are valid reasons for this to be done earlier/later.
12
13 1/ Thank you for telling about your intentions.
14
15 2/ The following is for information. I do not mean that it should block the
16 stabilization of the gentoo-sources-3.8.7 and I won't open a bug blocking it.
17
18 Up to you to decide if it should actually block it or not :
19
20 - ck-sources-3.8.3 users reported to me a regression occurring when booting in
21 UEFI mode.
22
23 - After analysis, I believe that it is related to a problem reported here :
24
25 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/21/461
26
27 - A couple of patches have been submitted by Matthew Garrett :
28
29 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/19/487
30 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/661
31 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/669
32
33 - I have parsed (but possibly not carefully enough) Greg's logs for the 3.8
34 branch and the above mentioned patches does not seem having been backported.
35
36 => I believe that this regression is likely to still be efficient in 3.8.7.
37
38 Gratefully,
39
40 Eric

Replies