1 |
John Mylchreest wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:19:22PM +0100, Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Revision 347: |
4 |
>> Linux 2.6.16.1 thanks to Francisco Lloret in bug #127838 (dsd) |
5 |
>> Added: 1000_linux-2.6.16.1.patch |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Since were bunlding these whole now, should we just start naming the |
8 |
> ebuilds correctly instead? |
9 |
|
10 |
I don't think so. 2 -stable releases in the 2.6.15 cycle didn't have any |
11 |
immediate corresponding gentoo-sources bump since the patches were |
12 |
already included. The fact that we include patches alongside -stable |
13 |
means that using their notation isn't entirely accurate in our situation. |
14 |
|
15 |
Daniel |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list |