Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kernel

From: Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o>
To: gentoo-kernel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] [ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.16-2 release
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:38:21
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-kernel] [ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.16-2 release by John Mylchreest
John Mylchreest wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:19:22PM +0100, Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote: >> Revision 347: >> Linux thanks to Francisco Lloret in bug #127838 (dsd) >> Added: 1000_linux- > > Since were bunlding these whole now, should we just start naming the > ebuilds correctly instead?
I don't think so. 2 -stable releases in the 2.6.15 cycle didn't have any immediate corresponding gentoo-sources bump since the patches were already included. The fact that we include patches alongside -stable means that using their notation isn't entirely accurate in our situation. Daniel -- gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-kernel] [ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.16-2 release Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o>