| 1 |
On Thursday 21 March 2013 13:22:35 Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> As to address your question, it doesn't come down to intention but |
| 4 |
> rather to manpower. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I appreciate this. |
| 7 |
However, when things go down to a problem of manpower, the very first |
| 8 |
initiative common sense commands is to avoid wasting it. |
| 9 |
And the first way I know to avoid wasting manpower is : |
| 10 |
- displaying intentions ! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I have asked here, in 3.4.9 times, for the intentions of the gentoo-sources |
| 13 |
regarding the 3.4 LTS and was answered that it would not be followed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Fair enough, because I wanted the ck-sources to follow it, we made the job of |
| 16 |
reviewing all upstream's patches from 3.4.9 up to 3.4.18 and from there up to |
| 17 |
3.4.23... and then discovered the gentoo-sources catching up from 3.4.9 to |
| 18 |
3.4.24. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Of course I do not blame anybody for this, after all, each to his own. |
| 21 |
However, the result of this is that we (as GS+CK) have almost certainly |
| 22 |
achieved a great part of the dirty job twice ! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Hence my first question regarding the gentoo-sources project's intentions |
| 25 |
regarding the 3.6 and 3.7 branches. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Eric |
Archives