Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-licenses@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-licenses] New license group FSF-NONFREE? |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:20:49 |
| Message-Id: | 21814.38141.539788.72567@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de |
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | There are several licenses in @OSI-APPROVED that the FSF explicitly |
| 3 | lists as nonfree, namely Artistic, NOSA, and Watcom-1.0. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I wonder if we should introduce an FSF-NONFREE group which would |
| 6 | contain either all licenses from [1], or only the conflicting ones. |
| 7 | Then users could set their ACCEPT_LICENSES variable to e.g. |
| 8 | "-* @FREE -@FSF-NONFREE" in order to avoid software released under |
| 9 | such licenses. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Opinions? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Ulrich |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#NonFreeSoftwareLicenses |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-licenses] New license group FSF-NONFREE? | Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-licenses] New license group FSF-NONFREE? | "Hanno Böck" <hanno@g.o> |