| 1 |
(sorry for the intrusion; I lurk Gentoo devel lists because I think |
| 2 |
Gentoo and Debian are similar :) ) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:28:22PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> But they label it as non-free: |
| 6 |
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libapache2-mod-fastcgi |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yeah; came here to say this: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
| paultag@franck:~$ dak ls libapache2-mod-fastcgi -s unstable |
| 11 |
| libapache2-mod-fastcgi | 2.4.7~0910052141-1.1 | unstable/non-free | amd64, i386 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Still non-free as far as Debian is concerned. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > Seems like at some point upstream changed their license: |
| 16 |
> > http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/6?q=node/14 |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
This license does look DFSG free; if these are the terms that are |
| 19 |
distributed with the source, we could likely move it to main. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> This seems to be identical with what we have in licenses/FastCGI ... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> > (before it had a clause that you could only use it to implement the |
| 24 |
> > fastcgi protocol) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> ... and this one we have in licenses/mod_fastcgi. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> > The upstream project seems a bit dead. We're currently using a |
| 29 |
> > source snapshot that is no longer available online (but probably |
| 30 |
> > better than using the even older release code). |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> > However I think we can change the license and have it in @free. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Which of the two licenses is actually included with the sources? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
^ this |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> Ulrich |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Cheers, |
| 41 |
Paul |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@××××××.org> | Proud Debian Developer |
| 45 |
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 |
| 46 |
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag |
| 47 |
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt |
Archives