| 1 |
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:19:35 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> As expected, the "Artistic" license is the most popular of the three. |
| 5 |
> I count 94 packages in the tree using it. This is if I don't count |
| 6 |
> packages that are dual licensed "|| ( Artistic GPL-1+ )" or similar. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Just scoring through them the third one I looked at (app-misc/when) had |
| 9 |
a wrong license. |
| 10 |
From their webpage: |
| 11 |
When is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it |
| 12 |
under the terms of the GPL, or, optionally, Perl's license. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So might be worth checking how many of those are just flagged wrong :-) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Hanno Böck |
| 18 |
http://hboeck.de/ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
mail/jabber: hanno@××××××.de |
| 21 |
GPG: BBB51E42 |
Archives