Gentoo Archives: gentoo-lisp

From: Panagiotis Christopoulos <pchrist@g.o>
To: gentoo-lisp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] gcl-2.6.10
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:06:54
Message-Id: 20140208220649.GA31298@earth.members.linode.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-lisp] gcl-2.6.10 by grozin@gentoo.org
1 On 23:34 Tue 04 Feb , grozin@g.o wrote:
2 > Hello *,
3 Hi,
4
5 >
6 > I've just committed gcl-2.6.10 (keyworded ~amd64 and ~x86). It compiles
7 > maxima on both arches, maxima tests run fine - no unexpected errors.
8
9 Thank you for working on this.
10
11 > The ebuild may have some rough edges, it's largely written from scratch.
12 > But I think it's OK for ~arch - it needs testing, and nobody will test it
13 > while it's hard-masked. So, I propose:
14 >
15 > 1. In profiles/package.mask, mask only <dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.10; let 2.6.10 be
16 > unmasked.
17 >
18 > 2. In profiles/arch/{amd64,x86}/use.mask unmask the USE flag gcl (I
19 > suppose I have to ask these arch teams to do it, after 1 is completed).
20 >
21 > Opinions?
22
23 Well, I haven't found time yet to test it. Something minor that I just noticed
24 is that it installs a /default.el file, but that should be easily fixable. I
25 also noticed a lot of fedora stuff while reading the ebuild. I 'll write you
26 more feedback as soon as I do some actual testing.
27
28 --
29 Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist )
30 ( Gentoo Lisp Project )