1 |
On 23:34 Tue 04 Feb , grozin@g.o wrote: |
2 |
> Hello *, |
3 |
Hi, |
4 |
|
5 |
> |
6 |
> I've just committed gcl-2.6.10 (keyworded ~amd64 and ~x86). It compiles |
7 |
> maxima on both arches, maxima tests run fine - no unexpected errors. |
8 |
|
9 |
Thank you for working on this. |
10 |
|
11 |
> The ebuild may have some rough edges, it's largely written from scratch. |
12 |
> But I think it's OK for ~arch - it needs testing, and nobody will test it |
13 |
> while it's hard-masked. So, I propose: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 1. In profiles/package.mask, mask only <dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.10; let 2.6.10 be |
16 |
> unmasked. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> 2. In profiles/arch/{amd64,x86}/use.mask unmask the USE flag gcl (I |
19 |
> suppose I have to ask these arch teams to do it, after 1 is completed). |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Opinions? |
22 |
|
23 |
Well, I haven't found time yet to test it. Something minor that I just noticed |
24 |
is that it installs a /default.el file, but that should be easily fixable. I |
25 |
also noticed a lot of fedora stuff while reading the ebuild. I 'll write you |
26 |
more feedback as soon as I do some actual testing. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) |
30 |
( Gentoo Lisp Project ) |