1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
CCing gentoo-lisp mailing list. |
4 |
|
5 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>: |
6 |
> Please project leaders try to reply in short. |
7 |
|
8 |
Though Emacs project (subproject of Lisp) has no official leader, I |
9 |
speak up as senior dev. :) |
10 |
|
11 |
> Are we fine? |
12 |
|
13 |
XEmacs: |
14 |
I cannot tell much, but graaff seems to have closed most of the severe |
15 |
bugs and worked on having more/bette eclasses for the app-xemacs |
16 |
category. |
17 |
|
18 |
GNU Emacs: |
19 |
* We took care of nearly all incoming bugs and punched ones |
20 |
still sitting around |
21 |
* Started keywording all packages with stable x86 and amd64 (majority |
22 |
is done) |
23 |
* Split up of eselect-ctags and eselect-emacs so them Vim wheenies |
24 |
stop crying (just after Portage was able to handle needed upgrade path |
25 |
correctly) |
26 |
* Files which enable additional packages from app-emacs category in |
27 |
Emacs are now stored in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-gentoo.d/, with |
28 |
full backwards compatability (fully transparent for non-aware users). |
29 |
emacs-updater from eselec-emacs package can check if you still have |
30 |
site files in the old location. |
31 |
* Support for echangelog (by C-c C-a) in app-emacs/gentoo-syntax |
32 |
* Man, we got so many test plans for our packages that arch teams |
33 |
should be able to stabilise our packages in the blink of an eye. |
34 |
* Fixed some more packages that were working but not in a good shape |
35 |
regarding coding practice (Emacs and Ebuild) |
36 |
|
37 |
> What are we going to do: |
38 |
|
39 |
* Improve the tree further, though we are nearly done |
40 |
* Bring some really handy packages into the tree from our overlay |
41 |
* Improve gentoo-syntax to use the whole Gentoo toolchain for Ebuild |
42 |
developers |
43 |
|
44 |
V-Li |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
48 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
49 |
|
50 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |