1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hi Imran, |
5 |
|
6 |
On 04/13/11 03:45, Imran Rafique wrote: |
7 |
> Will do. But there's one issue. I needed to replace /usr/bin/mzscheme |
8 |
> with a symlink to /usr/bin/racket. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Racket-5.1 (from this overlay) installs a /usr/bin/mzscheme binary in |
11 |
> addition to /usr/bin/racket. Seems like some useless leftover artifact |
12 |
> ('racket' provides the repl, 'mzscheme' segfaults) |
13 |
|
14 |
I wasn't aware, but I just checked and with the live ebuild that I have |
15 |
locally I indeed still get that file too and it does: |
16 |
|
17 |
$ mzscheme |
18 |
read failed to read all 31 bytes from file /usr/bin/mzscheme |
19 |
Aborted |
20 |
|
21 |
> Vim-7.3 was released when racket was still plt-scheme, and it |
22 |
> specifically looked for the mzscheme binary. vim-7.3.049 updated the |
23 |
> scheme support to work with racket, but vim still looks for |
24 |
> '/usr/bin/mzscheme' and uses it (sure, thats an upstream issue, but |
25 |
> its what we have right now). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Replacing /usr/bin/mzscheme with a symlink to /usr/bin/racket sorted |
28 |
> that issue out, but this really needs to be something which the racket |
29 |
> ebuild itself resolves (whats that mzscheme binary for, anyway?) |
30 |
|
31 |
I'll talk to upstream about the mzscheme executable. How hard would it |
32 |
be to fix vim to look for racket instead of mzscheme? |
33 |
|
34 |
Marijn |
35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
37 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
38 |
|
39 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk2lirAACgkQp/VmCx0OL2zalQCfdtdRCiOBDyVqz+K7exFTbIO7 |
40 |
N9AAn2MUFOOPd1D1mHA4LIigsD9UBKyb |
41 |
=jyc+ |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |