| 1 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 6 |
>> fine with SBCL and I think OpenMCL. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That should be SBCL and CLisp :) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Marijn |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> - -- |
| 13 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project |
| 14 |
> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 15 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 17 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> iD8DBQFHBlYdp/VmCx0OL2wRAtnwAKC+mgevD2sKiDoJZ6We571zScIXxACggfJT |
| 20 |
> TxDTPFVfOfqKOVOvrYayiJM= |
| 21 |
> =C3LO |
| 22 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Do you know anyone on the Axiom, FriCAS, OpenAxiom or Sage lists? I'm on |
| 25 |
all of them, and they're "Lisp-dependent". Briefly, there have been some |
| 26 |
flamewars and two Axiom developers got upset enough to fork off FriCAS |
| 27 |
and OpenAxiom. Where Sage fits into the picture is that they picked up |
| 28 |
FriCAS. The last I looked (yesterday) FriCAS was building with Clisp |
| 29 |
including all the X windows stuff. I'm not sure but I think they can |
| 30 |
build with SBCL too, but prefer Clisp because Cygwin carries it, giving |
| 31 |
them a working GUI CAS on a Windows box. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I haven't seen much from OpenAxiom or Sage recently, but the original |
| 34 |
Axiom is still carrying its own GCL source, which doesn't always work |
| 35 |
(like on AMD64 for 2.6.8pre, for example). For that matter, Axiom and |
| 36 |
its forks also depend on a more recent "noweb" than what's in Gentoo, |
| 37 |
and carry their own source of that too. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
So I'd say Gentoo is probably safe with both SBCL and Clisp. Is CMUCL as |
| 40 |
dead as I think it is? It's still masked on AMD64, right? |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-lisp@g.o mailing list |
Archives