| 1 |
On 21/02/11 18:07, Morgon Kanter wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey folks, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I noticed there wasn't yet an ebuild for the new version of Racket, so |
| 5 |
> I went ahead and made one. It's attached. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> A couple changes besides just bumping the version number: |
| 8 |
> * Doesn't really seem like that makefile patch was required anymore (I |
| 9 |
> didn't need it), so I commented that out. |
| 10 |
> * The new Racket GUI system doesn't appear to include any of those |
| 11 |
> external libraries that the ebuild used to issue an "rm" for, so I |
| 12 |
> removed those bits from the ebuild (as well as the formerly |
| 13 |
> commented-out rm commands that were replaced by something different). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> That's it for the changes, aside from a version bump. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Thanks, |
| 18 |
> -- Morgon |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Actually, there is a work-in-progress ebuild, but I didn't had the time |
| 21 |
to test it intensively, especially with the cgc and sgc garbage |
| 22 |
collectors, and the plain USE flags (as the makefile patch is related to |
| 23 |
those USEs), and I just it an "emake failed" with USE=plain. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Apart from some cosmetic changes (EAPI4, REAUIRED_USE="cgc? ( !sgc )", |
| 26 |
some spacing) my ebuild is the same :) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
May I ask you which USE flags combination(s) you tried it with, and on |
| 29 |
which arch? (applies for Neil too). |
| 30 |
Thanks for the feedback |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
,Cyprien |
Archives