From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GgYw8-0001Jd-62 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:44:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA53iPGG015599; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:44:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA53iOmi014088 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:44:24 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AB2642C4 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:44:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fO-ZD64RakIf for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from itchy.jusbaires.gov.ar (mail.jusbaires.gov.ar [200.59.145.70]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D3A64A2C for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (itchy [127.0.0.1]) by itchy.jusbaires.gov.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422976017 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:44:13 -0300 (ART) Received: from itchy.jusbaires.gov.ar ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (itchy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06731-01 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:44:11 -0300 (ART) Received: from mail.jusbaires.gov.ar (mail.jusbaires.gov.ar [10.1.0.2]) by itchy.jusbaires.gov.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE6A6016 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:44:11 -0300 (ART) Received: from entombed.zumbi.com.ar (unknown [10.21.0.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gpanizzo.jusbaires.gov.ar) by mail.jusbaires.gov.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE960DC29 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:44:10 -0300 (ART) From: "Gustavo Panizzo " To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-mips] is safe to use distcc over cross compile? Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:44:09 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611050044.09514.gfa@zumbi.com.ar> X-Archives-Salt: 7171d5af-6f7a-44a7-b9fb-a251e81d9baa X-Archives-Hash: ba976cfb9c99d8cb6b8c3f2fbc1ff99a Hi, i'm using a x86 box to cross compile, keeping the same version of gcc, is safe enough to use? tnx -- gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list