From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BD7138247 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD380E0C3D; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411A6E0C3D for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [176.253.35.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2846133FB58 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52E02C65.1010102@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:39:01 +0000 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] On MIPS using the same CHOST for all multilib ABIs References: <20131228235839.5bb0305a@gentoo.org> <20140116210119.421c952c@pomiot.lan> <52D84994.3070306@opensource.dyc.edu> <20140116222418.6229a1b0@pomiot.lan> <52D85D57.9010500@gentoo.org> <20140117054718.5f948b88@pomiot.lan> <52D9746E.4020200@gentoo.org> <20140117195154.4b512793@pomiot.lan> <52D98807.2060201@gentoo.org> <52DFD4B7.8060306@gentoo.org> <20140122153822.278588a9@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <20140122153822.278588a9@pomiot.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 72ec0e98-ecf0-40ee-a22d-72330d4fb651 X-Archives-Hash: 6745e5e2e0f00edaed5a830426ecbeb8 On 01/22/2014 02:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-01-22, o godz. 09:24:55 > "Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a): > >> 4) The debian debate about departing from GNU tuples (aka triplets) is here: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664257 >> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples >> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/TuplesAbandoned >> >> Their reasons are different than ours. The concern was over >> i386/486/585/686 inconsistencies and arm hard/soft float. Regarding the >> later issue, gcc upstream suggested using the vendor field which is what >> we do for hard/soft arm. >> >> 5) My recommendation is that the safest thing is to use the vendor field >> since it is recognized as "arbitrary". [...] > > Well, considering that it will fix the underlying issue, you have my > blessing :). If you are going to put 'gentoo' there somehow, even +2. > Do you mean change the CHOST for each ABI to contain the abi name in the vendor field? That should work... -- Regards, Markos Chandras