From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-mips+bounces-485-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969CD13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:45:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BEB3E0949;
	Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:45:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DD2E0949
	for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:45:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9CB6340084
	for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:45:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e89so1607892qgf.40
        for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.96.45 with SMTP id j42mr16762451qge.5.1411339547578;
 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-mips+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-mips+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-mips+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-mips.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.127.65 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <541F4951.4000409@gentoo.org>
References: <541412C5.4090809@gentoo.org> <20140917103121.6e822b45@pomiot.lan>
 <54198ECB.7010803@gentoo.org> <5419C9FD.6060106@gentoo.org>
 <5419DD6F.4000801@opensource.dyc.edu> <5419E3FF.9050408@gentoo.org>
 <5419E690.5010905@gentoo.org> <5419EB70.10209@gentoo.org> <5419ECD0.7000903@gentoo.org>
 <541F4951.4000409@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:45:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38EEF5X6ZHP56=QbNWKgCKsHVcDs_Ovz-1q2w8kggszi1A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] multilib problems on mips64 profiles
To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: b4a3039a-86f4-4baf-9e5e-078d33425493
X-Archives-Hash: be97d5ac140a24dae10adc6553b0c1bb

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Maybe we just don't want to support mips64/o32?  I'm starting to lean
> towards Ian's simple but asymmetric solution of turning off o32 in the
> inheriting profiles.

Either of those seem like fine solutions to me.