| 1 |
On 01/23/2014 3:48 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
>> I think that you're probably right about the added problems of |
| 3 |
>> attempting to keep a stable @system. Other stable architecture teams |
| 4 |
>> aren't really able to keep up and I'm not convinced that we should |
| 5 |
>> try. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Given the limited manpower and hardware we have, I would say it is very |
| 8 |
> hard to dedicate a box for testing a stable @system. If someone wants to |
| 9 |
> take over this role, then fine by me, but we need to make sure he will |
| 10 |
> be around and do this for as long as it takes. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Personally, I am happy the way things are at the moment and fixing |
| 13 |
> ~arch should be our priority |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Aye, sticking with ~arch is still the best right now. Perhaps soon, we can |
| 16 |
look at @system going stable once ~arch is nailed down. It's a bit of a |
| 17 |
slippery slope when you go stable, because the number of packages that users |
| 18 |
want to see stabilized usually goes up, not down. Especially once you start |
| 19 |
supporting *anything* under X11. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Joshua Kinard |
| 23 |
Gentoo/MIPS |
| 24 |
kumba@g.o |
| 25 |
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And |
| 28 |
our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic |
Archives