1 |
Hi Andrew, |
2 |
on Thursday, 2007-05-17 at 06:47:39, you wrote: |
3 |
> That sounds suspiciously like you forgot to enable tmpfs support in your |
4 |
> kernel. |
5 |
|
6 |
Indeed, that's what it was 8-] It's working just fine now, thanks! |
7 |
I'm still fighting with the recent 2.6.20 as it doesn't seem to |
8 |
recognize my disk, but 2.6.17 is fine as well so far. Just dm-crypt is |
9 |
*very* strange: |
10 |
| cryptsetup -s256 luksFormat /dev/hda5 |
11 |
| |
12 |
| WARNING! |
13 |
| ======== |
14 |
| This will overwrite data on /dev/hda5 irrevocably. |
15 |
| |
16 |
| Are you sure? (Type uppercase yes): YES |
17 |
| Enter LUKS passphrase: |
18 |
| Verify passphrase: |
19 |
| Command successful. |
20 |
| ann ~ # cryptsetup luksDump /dev/hda5 |
21 |
| automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggeredLUKS header information for /dev/hda5 |
22 |
| |
23 |
| Version: 1 |
24 |
| Cipher name: aes |
25 |
| Cipher mode: cbc-essiv:sha256 |
26 |
| Hash spec: sha1 |
27 |
| Payload offset: 2056 |
28 |
| MK bits: 256 |
29 |
| MK digest: 0a 1d c0 9b 6a 49 38 d1 f2 44 d4 e6 7e 53 2e 06 54 5d b7 9e |
30 |
| MK salt: 7b 88 7b 2a 7a 46 5c 97 72 93 3a 13 be db 61 f9 |
31 |
| 9c ca fb 60 fb d3 86 d2 67 aa e9 c5 9a 3b e8 62 |
32 |
| MK iterations: 0 |
33 |
| UUID: d3001762-dede-4634-aaf5-9005c34702b0 |
34 |
| |
35 |
| Key Slot 0: ENABLED |
36 |
| Iterations: 11658 |
37 |
| Salt: c9 0c 45 1f b5 83 46 ee 4f 09 10 f9 b6 40 8e ea |
38 |
| 76 62 e3 f3 ed dc 4f 93 f4 ac 89 91 b0 83 26 55 |
39 |
| Key material offset: 8 |
40 |
| AF stripes: 4000 |
41 |
| Key Slot 1: DISABLED |
42 |
| Key Slot 2: DISABLED |
43 |
| Key Slot 3: DISABLED |
44 |
| Key Slot 4: DISABLED |
45 |
| Key Slot 5: DISABLED |
46 |
| Key Slot 6: DISABLED |
47 |
| Key Slot 7: DISABLED |
48 |
| ann ~ # cryptsetup luksDump /dev/hda5 |
49 |
| /dev/hda5 is not a LUKS partition |
50 |
| Command failed. |
51 |
|
52 |
/dev/hda5 is not mounted or anything, and the second luksDump command |
53 |
came just a second after the first one. WTF?! |
54 |
|
55 |
And BTW, HD performance leaves much to be desired---is this normal for |
56 |
a 250 MHz MIPS? My 68040/40 Amiga did not much worse over its 7 MHz bus: |
57 |
| ann ~ # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M of=/dev/hda5 |
58 |
| dd: writing `/dev/hda5': No space left on device |
59 |
| 1871+0 records in |
60 |
| 1870+0 records out |
61 |
| 1961132544 bytes (2.0 GB) copied, 208.289 s, 9.4 MB/s |
62 |
| ann ~ # hdparm /dev/hda |
63 |
| |
64 |
| /dev/hda: |
65 |
| multcount = 32 (on) |
66 |
| IO_support = 1 (32-bit) |
67 |
| unmaskirq = 1 (on) |
68 |
| using_dma = 1 (on) |
69 |
| keepsettings = 0 (off) |
70 |
| readonly = 0 (off) |
71 |
| readahead = 256 (on) |
72 |
| geometry = 19846/16/63, sectors = 20005650, start = 0 |
73 |
|
74 |
I was planning to put a partly crypted drive from my HPPA box in there, |
75 |
and I hoped at about twice the clock it would perform better... |
76 |
|
77 |
cheers! |
78 |
Matthias |
79 |
-- |
80 |
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: FAC37665 |
81 |
Fingerprint: 8C16 3F0A A6FC DF0D 19B0 8DEF 48D9 1700 FAC3 7665 |