Gentoo Archives: gentoo-mips

From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-mips@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] JFS on non-intel [ Was O2 Sound and Misc Stuff]
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:30:47
Message-Id: a728f9f90702091430p259e1c01lca9e40b8820e1ee7@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-mips] JFS on non-intel [ Was O2 Sound and Misc Stuff] by "J. Scott Kasten"
1 On 2/9/07, J. Scott Kasten <jscottkasten@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > Alex, thanks. I read through it in detail. That finally triggered my
4 > memory. There were multiple issues that affected 2.6.12 - 2.6.14.
5 >
6 > In your case, it probably wasn't JFS specifically, but most likely an
7 > interaction between JFS and the LVM layer. I never tried that feature.
8 > This affected 2.6.12 and 2.6.13
9 >
10 > http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general/2005-10/msg00020.html
11 >
12 > Here is also an interesting LWN article about the 4k page issue that came
13 > out at the same time and how it affected device_mapper, LVM and such
14 > things. (See the second section.)
15 >
16 > http://lwn.net/Articles/149977/
17 >
18 > Here's a complaint about 2.6.13 and 2.6.14 on AMD with ext3. This is just
19 > an example of other complaints that were comming in.
20 >
21 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/09/27/62
22 >
23 > In short, there were multiple sources of corruption at that time and you
24 > could have been bitten by any of them. Hopefully things are more settled
25 > now, but I certainly will watch out for any issues.
26
27 Thanks for the update! those indeed look like they may have been the
28 cause of my problems. Too bad I can't test that set up again to see
29 if it works today.
30
31 Alex
32
33 >
34 > -S-
35 >
36 > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
37 >
38 > > On 2/9/07, J. Scott Kasten <jscottkasten@×××××.com> wrote:
39 > >>
40 > >> I'm interested in your data point. Do you happen to remember about which
41 > >> kernel that was? There was some general badness that affected multiple
42 > >> file systems in late 2.6.13 on into 2.6.14 or so in the way that you
43 > >> describe. Not sure they ever really knew what the smoking gun was.
44 > >
45 > > http: //sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7852301&forum_id=43911
46 > > http: //www.mail-archive.com/sparclinux@×××××××××××.org/msg00333.html
47 > >
48 > > Alex
49 > >
50 > --
51 > gentoo-mips@g.o mailing list
52 >
53 >
54 --
55 gentoo-mips@g.o mailing list