1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Francisco Javier Lloreda Sanchez wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
| Sure, here are our tracepath to rsync.osuosl.org: |
7 |
| |
8 |
| linuv root # tracepath rsync.osuosl.org 1: linuv.informat.uv.es |
9 |
| (147.156.17.151) 0.183ms pmtu 1500 1: |
10 |
| farsoro.red.uv.es (147.156.16.1) 1.477ms 2: |
11 |
| neveral3.red.uv.es (147.156.201.6) 0.823ms 3: |
12 |
| AT0-2-0-0.EB-Valencia0.red.rediris.es (130.206.211.181) asymm 4 |
13 |
| 0.915ms 4: VAL.SO3-0-0.EB-IRIS4.red.rediris.es (130.206.240.13) |
14 |
| asymm 5 6.647ms 5: rediris.es1.es.geant.net (62.40.103.61) |
15 |
| asymm 6 6.946ms 6: es.it1.it.geant.net (62.40.96.186) |
16 |
| asymm 7 29.354ms 7: it.de2.de.geant.net (62.40.96.61) |
17 |
| asymm 8 38.472ms 8: abilene-gw.de2.de.geant.net (62.40.103.254) |
18 |
| asymm 9 132.083ms 9: nycmng-washng.abilene.ucaid.edu |
19 |
| (198.32.8.84) asymm 10 152.019ms 10: |
20 |
| chinng-nycmng.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.82) asymm 11 |
21 |
| 151.865ms 11: iplsng-chinng.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.77) |
22 |
| asymm 12 155.185ms 12: kscyng-iplsng.abilene.ucaid.edu |
23 |
| (198.32.8.81) asymm 13 164.411ms 13: |
24 |
| dnvrng-kscyng.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.13) asymm 14 |
25 |
| 179.089ms 14: snvang-dnvrng.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.1) |
26 |
| asymm 15 199.791ms 15: pos-1-0.core0.eug.oregon-gigapop.net |
27 |
| (198.32.163.17) 211.960ms 16: nero.eug.oregon-gigapop.net |
28 |
| (198.32.163.151) asymm 18 212.290ms 17: |
29 |
| eugn-core1-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.168) asymm 19 |
30 |
| 212.524ms 18: corv-car1-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.6) |
31 |
| asymm 20 214.216ms 19: rsync.osuosl.org (140.211.166.135) |
32 |
| asymm 20 216.091ms reached Resume: pmtu 1500 hops 19 back 20 |
33 |
|
34 |
This looks like it is a bottleneck across the pond.. I'm seeing the |
35 |
same bottleneck when I trace back via a different site on Internet2. |
36 |
|
37 |
Last I knew, GEANT had multiple 10 gige to new york (via the |
38 |
Netherlands), and that is where it peers Abilene. The link is not |
39 |
saturated by any means[1], and GEANT looks to be fine as well[2]. If |
40 |
the problem persists I can talk to some people in Abilene on Monday. |
41 |
Most of them are still at the SC04 conference tearing down the network |
42 |
there this weekend. |
43 |
|
44 |
Cheers, |
45 |
|
46 |
- -Corey |
47 |
|
48 |
[1] - |
49 |
http://stryper.uits.iu.edu/abilene/summary.cgi?network=nycm-geant-newyork&data=bits |
50 |
[2] - http://stats.geant.net/usagemap/usagemap |
51 |
|
52 |
- -- |
53 |
Corey Shields |
54 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
55 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
56 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
57 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
58 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
59 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
60 |
|
61 |
iD8DBQFBli5epq/4o6MEFFMRAt4LAJ9WfqscKd+hfwQnUCs0tC2RjR/nlgCfU30M |
62 |
14/pSOUqCs9NzWXMNB6cMnI= |
63 |
=JK36 |
64 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
65 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
-- |
68 |
gentoo-mirrors@g.o mailing list |