Archives
Archives
| From: | Felix Janda <felix.janda@××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>, gentoo-musl@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-musl] [GSoC] _GNU_SOURCE in C++ | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:57:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20160614095558.GA528@nyan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-musl] [GSoC] _GNU_SOURCE in C++ by Lei Zhang |
||
| 1 | Lei Zhang wrote: |
| 2 | > 2016-06-14 16:10 GMT+08:00 Felix Janda <felix.janda@××××××.de>: |
| 3 | > > Take a look at the discussion at |
| 4 | > > |
| 5 | > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/04/15/3 |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > And some view from the LLVM side: |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/46390 |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Thanks for the pointer. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/04/15/5 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | gives the reasons why musl is using macros and cannot easily use |
| 16 | symbol aliases (as suggested in the mail you've linked to). |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Several questions on the thread on the llvm list have been left |
| 19 | unanswered. I think it would make sense to reopen the discussion. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | > IMHO, the real problem is the abuse of _GNU_SOURCE by C++ compiler. |
| 22 | > The decisions made by LLVM and musl both look reasonable to me. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | That's a real problem, but I guess also a difficult one to fix. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Felix |