Gentoo Archives: gentoo-musl

From:	Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com>
To:	gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Cc:	gentoo-musl@l.g.o
Subject:	[gentoo-musl] Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2
Date:	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:48:04
Message-Id:	`CAOYuCc0QpED8Rvg4eDTg0Bw7fgxxP=hWeZOuwR0Q-rAW7=zS=Q@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-musl] Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2 by "Anthony G. Basile"

1	2016-06-11 23:20 GMT+08:00 Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o>:
2	> On 6/11/16 11:17 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
3	>>
4	>> I heard GCC 6 has official support for musl, but haven't checked it out myself.
5	>
6	> it does, i have checked, but there is some c++ symbol poisoning that
7	> needs to be worked out.
8
9	Does it work the same way as other libc, i.e. with a single option
10	like "-mmusl"?
11
12	I've been curious why the need to specify libc name in an option,
13	since it's already embedded in the target triplet.
14
15
16	Lei