Gentoo Archives: gentoo-musl

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-musl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:25:41
Message-Id: 75a6de89-c83a-4470-b864-74f0c0ca1c9e@opensource.dyc.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-musl] Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2 by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 On 6/11/16 11:20 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
2 > On 6/11/16 11:17 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
3 >> 2016-06-11 23:12 GMT+08:00 Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o>:
4 >>> On 6/11/16 11:08 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
5 >>>> 2016-06-11 22:50 GMT+08:00 Benda Xu <heroxbd@×××××.com>:
6 >>>>> Hi,
7 >>>>>
8 >>>>> Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com> writes:
9 >>>>>
10 >>>>>> - send the first set of patches to clang/LLVM, which enables clang to
11 >>>>>> build binaries agains musl
12 >>>>>
13 >>>>> That's interesting. Could you give a reference of your patch?
14 >>>>
15 >>>> Here: https://github.com/zzlei/musl-clang
16 >>>>
17 >>>> They are not accepted yet :)
18 >>>>
19 >>>>
20 >>>> Lei
21 >>>>
22 >>>
23 >>> those are approaximately the equivalent of the gcc patches for musl at
24 >>>
25 >>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/musl.git/tree/sys-devel/gcc/files/gcc-4.8.3-musl-linker-path.patch
26 >>
27 >> I heard GCC 6 has official support for musl, but haven't checked it out myself.
28 >>
29 >>
30 >> Lei
31 >>
32 >
33 > it does, i have checked, but there is some c++ symbol poisoning that
34 > needs to be worked out.
35 >
36 >
37
38 Sorry for the email spam but the symbol poisoning issue is reported here
39 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-04/msg00194.html
40
41 --
42 Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
43 Chair of Information Technology
44 D'Youville College
45 Buffalo, NY 14201
46 (716) 829-8197