Gentoo Archives: gentoo-musl

From:	Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com>
To:	Peter Smith <peter.smith@××××××.org>
Cc:	"Rafael Espíndola" <rafael.espindola@×××××.com>, llvm-commits <llvm-commits@××××××××××.org>, musl@××××××××××××××.com, gentoo-musl@l.g.o, cfe-commits cfe <cfe-commits@××××××××××.org>
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: Add support for musl-libc on Linux
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:10:07
Message-Id:	`CAOYuCc1KcX_n2m75FH-fX+67qwOgx7XTjLKtLnayBQnTqtxkng@mail.gmail.com`

1	2016-06-20 19:44 GMT+08:00 Peter Smith <peter.smith@××××××.org>:
2	> From what I can see, the EABI type is used to decide if certain
3	> __aeabi_ prefixed functions such as __aeabi_idiv are available. If
4	> Musl differs in function availability from the GNU library here I
5	> think you'll need a Musl EABI type. However if there is no difference
6	> you should be able to use the EABI::GNU type for Musl.
7
8	I think musl and glibc is compatible on this; I'm just a little
9	concerned that using EABI::GNU for both GNUEABI* and MuslEABI* might
10	cause some confusion.
11
12	> You might find http://reviews.llvm.org/D12413 helpful here
13	> (introduction of -meabi option).
14
15	It seems clang's -meabi option is incompatible with gcc's.
16
17
18	Lei