| 1 |
Aric Belsito wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is mostly a question for Blueness, but in the Gentoo repository, we |
| 3 |
> currently have sys-libs/fts-standalone -- but I cannot link elfutils |
| 4 |
> against it (build-time issues). |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On the other hand, there is the musl-fts library |
| 7 |
> (https://github.com/pullmoll/musl-fts) which does work (and I currently |
| 8 |
> have in the musl-extras repository) but as Blueness put the |
| 9 |
> fts-standalone package into the gentoo repository, is the maintainer, |
| 10 |
> and wrote it, it seemed like a bad idea to use musl-fts instead. I'd |
| 11 |
> like some advice. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The main reason I ask is because in updating sys-fs/f2fs-tools, it gains |
| 14 |
> the sys-libs/libselinux dependency, which won't build on musl without |
| 15 |
> fts. IcedTea, Chromium, and SystemTap also require elfutils. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
A while ago, I've reported to blueness the duplication between |
| 18 |
musl-fts and fts-standalone: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
https://github.com/blueness/fts-standalone/issues/1 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks for bringing this up again (and your working ebuild for it). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I also wanted to note that there is now a bug for elfutils with musl: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602126 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Felix |
Archives