1 |
2016-07-05 18:24 GMT+08:00 Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> - My previous patches to clang/LLVM which add support for musl are |
3 |
> still in the trunk, and probably available only after version 3.9. In |
4 |
> my ebuilds, should I fetch source from the trunk or instead stick with |
5 |
> version 3.8 and maintain a set of downstream patches? |
6 |
|
7 |
Unfortunately some features I took for granted are also absent in |
8 |
version 3.8, e.g. using libc++ instead of libstdc++ as the default. If |
9 |
sticking with 3.8, I'd have to make patches for these features too :( |
10 |
|
11 |
Is it acceptable to build packages using under-development source? |
12 |
What about dubbing it 3.8.0-r200 or something? |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Lei |