1 |
On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 19:50 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: |
2 |
> On 20-07-17 21:41:30, Roy Bamford wrote: |
3 |
> > Team, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > The responses so far raise a further questions. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > The Foundation currently has 74 members, not all of whom can serve as trustees. |
8 |
> > The board consists of 5 members. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > It follows that the board must consist of about 7% of the membership. |
11 |
> > I'll go on to suggest that 7% is an unreasonably large proportion of the membership |
12 |
> > required to serve on the board of our own legal entity. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > As supporting evidence, I'll cite the lack of competition for seats on the board |
15 |
> > over the last 12 years. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > How do the candidates that favour maintaining our own legal entity intend to attract |
18 |
> > a) more members? |
19 |
> > b) members willing and able to serve as trustees? |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > -- |
22 |
> > Regards, |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Roy Bamford |
25 |
> > (Neddyseagoon) a member of |
26 |
> > elections |
27 |
> > gentoo-ops |
28 |
> > forum-mods |
29 |
> > arm64 |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I would suggest an alternative, we could reduce down to 3 trustees. |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Are you sure we won't end up with a little low bus factor? Although |
35 |
I do realize there's no real difference between having 3 Trustees |
36 |
and having 3 active Trustees out of 5 (not saying this is right now, |
37 |
just theoretically). |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Best regards, |
42 |
Michał Górny |