1 |
I would be curious who actually has the authority to make such a |
2 |
report in the first place. |
3 |
|
4 |
I'm not exactly sure on NM law, but as far as I know in general, only |
5 |
the legal owner of a piece of property or someone acting on their |
6 |
behalf has the authority to press charges for such things. So infra |
7 |
or council or what have you couldn't actually be the ones to act on a |
8 |
ban evasion unless they had authorization from trustees (even if |
9 |
indirectly). IANAL though. |
10 |
|
11 |
My guess though is that some formalization of the foundation's control |
12 |
over infrastructure would clarify such authority going forward if |
13 |
necessary. |
14 |
|
15 |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 4:11 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
16 |
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
17 |
>> W dniu sob, 14.04.2018 o godzinie 17∶27 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
18 |
>> napisał: |
19 |
>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Thode |
20 |
>>> <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
21 |
>>> > |
22 |
>>> > - Formalize Gentoo Foundation's control over Gentoo infrastructure (src: drobbins) |
23 |
>>> > - https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/151b44012a649a98a5e5268d3ed35bdd |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> While you're discussing securing our infrastructure you might want to |
26 |
>>> discuss what actions the Foundation intends to take in the event |
27 |
>>> somebody trespasses on our property, such as using it after being |
28 |
>>> expressly told not to. |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> Does the law of the NM state permit shooting trespassers? And if not, |
32 |
>> can we please move it to one that does? |
33 |
>> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> You could report the intrusion to the FBI as a violation of the |
36 |
> Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. This might be more harmful than |
37 |
> shooting. |
38 |
> |