1 |
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 08:30 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I apologise if I did something inappropriate, |
5 |
|
6 |
No worries, you did nothing like that. Just don't want to have everyone |
7 |
asking questions to the SPI about Gentoo :) No big deal or anything. |
8 |
|
9 |
> > > I was |
10 |
> > > told that the process should be the following, we need to let them |
11 |
> > > know that we would like to join with a specific one person contact |
12 |
> > > address |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > And that's a hug road block to me. One contact from Gentoo to the SPI. |
15 |
> > That will not work for us. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Yes, I completely agree with this point, I also sow it as a bit of a |
18 |
> drawback, but I also understand the reasons that made them require one |
19 |
> personal contact from each project. |
20 |
|
21 |
I understand their requirements, I just don't believe that aspects works |
22 |
for us. I am not sure how others deal with that. Like a MIA liason and |
23 |
turn over there. |
24 |
|
25 |
All in all kinda moot till we decide to go that direction. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
29 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
30 |
Gentoo Foundation |