| 1 |
I detect a bit of sarcasm, and some later posts were a bit heated. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
No, I'm not angry, but can we please relax? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
No, I'm not comrel or acting in an official capacity, but I think |
| 6 |
things could be more productive with a bit less heated emotion going |
| 7 |
around and a bit more coolness and collectedness. Logic tends to get |
| 8 |
chased out the hallway when emotion gets involved. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
So, just as a causal request, can everyone please try to calm down? |
| 11 |
This is a humble request to drobbins, rich0, and anyone else who may |
| 12 |
have already fanned any flames or may yet be tempted to do so. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As for practical topics...I agree with the tangent Neddy touched on, |
| 17 |
namely that this is a legal entity set up as a business (not in the |
| 18 |
sense of a profit making endeavor, but as a legal entity with its own |
| 19 |
persona), and thus we need to be careful about |
| 20 |
profit/tax/employment/etc implications. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The legal arena is a potential minefield and caution is due. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Whether such caution is already being taken or not is a separate issue |
| 25 |
that I'll leave to those who know. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 28 |
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> I was actually shocked at how hard it was to determine the "mean wage" |
| 32 |
>> of the USA. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Yeah, man -- I know what you mean. Google can be notoriously difficult to |
| 36 |
> use sometimes. Thanks for performing that shockingly hard research for us. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -Daniel |
Archives