1 |
Daniel, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 13:38 -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Anyway, not wanting to start a flame war or really start further |
6 |
> discussion, just answering your question from my perspective. And I |
7 |
> have used up all my time for Gentoo discussion for this week, so I |
8 |
> need to get back to real work :) |
9 |
|
10 |
Thank you very much, that's exactly what I was looking for in a |
11 |
response. |
12 |
|
13 |
I was partly asking, since due to your role in the past. You might be in |
14 |
a unique position to help move things forward. Knowing what did work, |
15 |
what didn't, etc. Not looking to place any blame/credit for a failure or |
16 |
success in the structure. |
17 |
|
18 |
Also was not looking to enter a discussion or debate. Just for what was |
19 |
provided. Again thanks for that, and please reconsider your declination |
20 |
for acceptance as a nominee. |
21 |
|
22 |
No one is saying your ideas are bad, or we don't want to work with you. |
23 |
Completely the opposite. Although at the same time, surely can't give |
24 |
you all the reassurance, power, or room to maneuver as you would like. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
28 |
Gentoo/amd64/Java |